CORRECTIONAL LAW
CJ 4135
3 Units

SYLLABUS

Dr. William Bourns                                     See Office Hours on Door
Department of Sociology/Criminal Justice      or
Room: C207-B                                               Leave message on voice mail,
Phone: 209/664-6722                                      e-mail, or in my mail box in the
E-Mail: WBourns@stan.csustan.edu              office. I am also available before
                                                                        and after class.

TEXTS:

Book #1 — Required
Correctional Law for the Correctional Officer, 3rd edition
William C. Collins, J.D., American Correctional Association, Baltimore, MD. 2001

Book #2 — Required
Legal Aspects of Corrections Management, 1997
Clair A. Cripe, Aspen Publications, Inc.

Book #3 — Required
Life Without Parole: Living in Prison Today, 2nd edition 1999
Thomas Bernard, Richard McCleary, Richard Wright, Roxbury Publishing

Book #4 — Recommended
Constitutional Rights of Prisoners, 6th edition 1999
John W. Palmer and Stephen E. Palmer, Anderson Publishing Co.

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

Using a case study approach, the new and developing field of applied correctional law deals with the rights, responsibilities, and liabilities of correctional personnel working in county, state or federal capacities. Details differences, which occur depending on the status of the offender, i.e., juvenile or adult, county or state, probation or parole, and defendant or prisoner, Prerequisite: CJ 2250, CJ 3130 or consent of instructor.

PURPOSE OR OBJECTIVE OF THE COURSE:

1. To acquaint pre-entry students with Correctional Law especially rights of inmates
2. To introduce the basic case law of prisoners rights taken from U.S. Supreme Court cases on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth and fourteen amendments.
3. To introduce students to the major issues in correctional law.

EXPECTATIONS OF STUDENTS:


GRADING:

1. Hour Exam I (multi-choice and short-answer) 100 points
2. Hour Exam II (multi-choice short-answer) 100 points
3. Everyone Case Assignment 15 points
4. Individual Case Assignment(s) 15-30 points
5. NCJRS Assignment (group) 15 points
6. ACA Prison Standards Assignment (group) 20 points
7. Prisoner Religion Assignment (group) 20 points
8. Final Exam: Case Study (In Class) 200 points
TOTAL 500 points

Standard Deviation +3 to +2 A
Standard Deviation +2 to +1 B
Standard Deviation +1 to —1 C
Standard Deviation —1 to —2 D
Standard Deviation —2 to —3 F

PLEASE NOTE: Your letter grade for the course is based upon your total accumulation of points. A perfect score would be 500 points. An average score would be half of this or 250 points. Your letter grade will not be known until the final class points mean is computed and then placed into a grade curve (based upon standard deviation units). Remember: You will not get letter grades during the course (you accumulate points). The plus and minus grading option will not be used in this course.

TERM PAPER:

After reading Life Without Parole, you will write a 4-6 page paper. The first page or so of the paper will consist of a brief summary of the book. In the remaining pages, you will compare the experiences of the people in the book to the cases and issues we have discussed in class. You will be graded on the thoughtfulness and accuracy of your observations, as well as on the quality of your writing. This paper must be typed and doubled-spaced, with normal margins and a 12-point font. It is due MAY 17TH. Points will be deducted for late papers. 100 points (see grading)

MAKE-UP EXAMS:

With appropriate documentation, such as any of the following, a student may take a missed hour exam:

  • Notice of death or funeral home program card for immediate family (father, mother, sister(s), brother(s) or grandparent(s).
  • Upon appropriate documentation of illness (doctor's note or hospital document)
  • Military service or having to work in a criminal justice capacity and upon presentation of military orders or a note from your criminal justice agency letterhead stating you had to work and signed by your supervisor or superior.
  • All other emergencies (such as your children) or other factors that caused you to miss an hour exam will be evaluated and judged by the instructor as to the permission of a student to take a missed hour examination. All these events will require some form of documentation.

  •  

     
     
     

    CASE BRIEFING:
    The instructor will assign students at random to orally brief the assigned cases. If you are absent on the day of your presentation, or if you are unprepared to brief the case, your grade will be adversely affected. Due to the size of the class, you will likely be given only one or two chances to brief. It is vital, therefore, that you come to class prepared. 15-30 points. (see grading)

    ELECTRONIC DEVICES:

    Please turn off all cell phones and pagers during class.

    PLAGIARISM:

    All perspective criminal justice students fall under a Code of Ethics. For future police officers the IACP (International Chiefs of Police) has a code and for juvenile and corrections the American Correctional Association (ACA) has one. Sociologists also have a well-developed code of ethics. Plagiarism violations (the incorporation of another's work into your own without citation of the source) are part of these codes. When you apply to work in the criminal justice system, pre-investigators do a background check including talking with your criminal justice professors. Don't be caught plagiarizing. Plagiarism is a violation of the student code of ethics. If in doubt, cite the source(s).

    ATTENDANCE:

    Good scholars are good class attenders. Much of the material on exams is from class lectures and not in your book(s). Classroom attendance and class participation can help to make the difference from a marginal grade moved upwards toward a better grade. Students are expected to attend 80% of all classes. Students who miss 4 or more classes on a Tuesday-Thursday schedule or who miss 6 or more classes on a Monday-Wednesday-Friday schedule will have their grade lowered.

    WORKING IN A GROUP:

    Please note the class schedule for dates due for group presentations. All students are expected to take part in a group presentation. Released class time will be made available for group meetings. All students expected to attend group meetings and do their share of the work within the group.

    A group evaluation by the instructor will be made for each group and each group member will evaluate him/herself and all other members of his/her group. A combination of the instructor's ranking (up to 50 points) and a peer group member ranking (up to 50 points) will be made in order to determine a group grade. If you have low points, you have a chance to improve your score by helping the group do an excellent paper and presentation.

    REMEMBER: YOU MUST USE APA STYLE FOR YOUR PAPER

    APA Reference Web Sites:
    http://www.vanguard.edu/pshchology/apa.html

    APA style essentials
    http://www.apa.org/journal/webref.html

    NMSU Library
    Electronic Reference Formats
    Recommended by American Psychological Association
    http://www.webster.commnet.edu/apa/apa_index.html
    APA Citations (Webster University)
    http://www.library.uscu.edu/library/ref/instruction/refguides/apa.html
    USCS Library Reference System
    APA Style Citations and References

    CLASS TOPICS BY TEACHING UNIT



     
     
     

    Unit #1 - Introduction/Course Requirements: American Common Law — Civil v. Criminal

    Burden of Proof: Civil v. Criminal
    Rule of Law
    The need for legal rules: Justice without rules
    "Color of Law"
    "Authority of Law"
    American Common Law — Reasonableness
    Equitable relief — petition court
    Precedent — stare decisis
    Case Law
    American Courts — Adversarial
    Civil Court and Criminal Court
    Burden of Proof: Preponderance of Evidence verses Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt

    Readings: Cripe;, Chapter #1 -- Collins, Chapter #1 -- Lecture

    Unit #2 - Legal Foundation of Law - U.S. Constitution — 1-10 Amendments

    14 Amendment: Due Process
    The U.S. Constitution — "We the People ..."
    Framers — looked upon as criminals of England
    Minority decent — TWO SIDES
    "Bill of Rights"
    14th Amendment: The Second U.S. Constitution?
    Doctrine of Incorporation
    Rights of prisoners within the first 10 amendments
    Prisoners and Due Process of 14th Amendment
    1st Amendment: Religion - Free speech - Communications (written and oral) in prison
    5th Amendment: Self-discrimination
    6th Amendment: Speedy and public trial and informed of nature and cause of accusation
    8th Amendment: Cruel and Unusual Punishment
    14th Amendment: Due Process
    State Penal Codes and Statutes
    State Regulations and Standards
    The Interstate Agreement and Compacts
    Agreement on Detainers
    Extraditions of prisoners
    Transfer of prisoners Inter/Intra state
    Out-of-state Parolee Supervision
    Uniform Crime Victims Reparation Act

    Readings: Cripe Chapter #1 -- Cripe, Chapter #5 -- Cripe, Chapter #17 -- Collins,

    Chapter #11 -- Lecture

    Unit #3 — Trial Courts — Appellate Courts

    Courts of Last Resort
    Federalism — separation of powers and courts
    Steps to the U.S. Supreme Court
    Trial Courts
    Appeal Courts
    Courts of Last Resort
    Steps to the U.S. Supreme Court
    Wrist of certiorari petitions
    Role of the Courts in interpreting the law and Constitutional safe guards
    Prisoner access to courts

    Readings: Cripe, Chapter #2 -- Cripe, Chapter #4 -- Collins, Chapter #4

    Unit #4 — Citations — Looking Up Cases

    Lexes Nexus and other computer searchers
    CASE Law Research
    Opinion of Court
    dissenting opinion
    concurring opinion
    Parts of the citation
    Briefing a case
    Individual (Everyone) Exercise:
    Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263 (1980)

    Readings: Cripe, Chapter #4 -- Lecture

    Unit #5 — Types of Prisoner Cases - Habeas Corpus

    Appeals
    Habeas Corpus
    Civil Rights Law Suites (note:1983 law suites covered in later unit)
    Alternatives to Litigation
    Problems of Litigation
    TORTS
    Unit of Mandamus
    Declaratory Judgment
    Appeal of Probation and Parole Boards
    Administrative law appeal
    Innate Grievances
    Access to Courts
    Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
    Jailhouse lawyers
    Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483 (1969)
    Lewis v. Casey, 116 S.Ct. 2174 (1996)
    Law Libraries — Legal Assistance

    Readings: Collins, Chapter #2 -- Collins, Chapter #3 -- Cripe, Chapter #3

    Unit # 6 — Correctional Law

    Hands off — Hands On -- One Hand-On and One Hand-Off
    Hands-off: Early to Mid 1900's
    Separation of Power
    Federalism
    Maintenance of Institutional Security
    Ruffin v. The Commonwealth of Virginia, 62 VA. (21 Gratt) 790 (1871)
    "Slave" in prison
    "A naked man in claims posses no risk"
    Valentine v. Englehardtt, 472 F. Supp. 1039 (D.N.J.) 1980 (1979)
    Hands-On: Warren Court 1953-1969 to protect the Constitutional Rights of
    Disfavored Minorities
    Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
    Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
    exclusionary rule due process applicable to states
    Discarding the "hand-off" doctrine
    Discarding the "iron curtain of separation of and U.S. Constitution
    Wolff v. McDonnell, 419 U.S. 539 (1974)
    Ex parte Hull, 312 U.S. 546 (1941)

    Readings: Cripe, Chapter #3 -- Cripe, Chapter #6 -- Collins, Chapter #5

    Unit #6A (continued)

    Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 482 (1969) see unit 4 also
    Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977)
    Lewis v. Casey, 64 U.S. L.W. 4587 (1996)
    Murry v. Giarratano, 492 U.S. 1 (1989)
    Standards and Regulations in prisons and jails
    Wolf v. Martinez, 418 U.S. 539 (1974)
    One Hand On-One Hand-Off: Burger Court 1969-1986
    move back from liberalism of the court "Courts shouldn't meddle" defense
    "retaliation programs: not a right but..."
    The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) 1995
    Title 18 U.S. Code, Section 3626 (b) (2)
    Court review of prisons — Federal Judge run prisons — Oklahoma
    Bivens Type Actions (Soverign Immunity)
    Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
    Bivens General Actions

    Reading: Cripe, Chapter #3 -- Cripe, Chapter #6 -- Collins, Chapter #5

    Unit #7 — The Balancing Test: Inmate Rights versus Institutional Safety Types of Prisons

    Placement
    PSI: Pre-Sentence Investigations
    Punishment: historical to modern ideology
    Types of Prisons — Min. Medium — Max
    Notorious Prisons: Alcatraz
    Sing Sing
    Jails

    Readings: Collins, Chapter #5 -- Cripe, Chapter #19

    Unit #8 — Prisoners in the United States

    NIJ/NCJRS Data and Data Sources
    Federal Bureau of Business
    ACLU and Prisoners
    American Correctional Association (ACA)
    Bed Space
    Profiles of different types of prisoners
    NCJRS Assignment (Group Exercise)

    Readings: NIJ Web Site -- OJS Web site -- Lectue

    Unit #9 — Inmate Discipline/Cell Searcher and Seize of Property

    Searches in Prison
    Strip Searches (male to male and female to female -- male on female and female on male)
    Pat Down Searches and other Inmate Searches
    Visitor Searches
    Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984)
    Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979)
    Lanza v. New York, 370 U.S. 139 (1962)
    United States v. Hearst, 563 F.Zd 1331 (9th Cir. 1977)
    Inmate Discipline and Punishment
    Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments as applied to discipline/punishment
    Importance of Inmate/Correctional officer safety
    Importance of Inmate and Correctional Officer safty
    How Prison Discipline Works
    Use of Force on Prisoners
    Deadly Force
    Self-Reference
    Enforcement of Prison Rules and Discipline
    Preventing Escapes
    Documentation of use of force on prisoners
    Confidential Informants
    Appendix (Cripe) A Inmate Rights and Responsibilities
    Appendix (Cripe) B Prohibited Acts and Displinary Severity Scale
    "Graddaddy Case" Wolff v. McDonnel, 418 U.S. 539 (1974) see also Unit 6
    Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. , 132 L. Ed.zd 418,115 Sct 2293 (1995)
    Baxter v. Paligiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976)
    Superintendent of the Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Helms, 472 U.S. 445 (1985)

    Readings: Collins, Chapter #10 -- Cripe, Chapter 10 -- Cripe, Chapter #10 -- Cripe,

    Chapter #11

    Unit #10 — Prison and Jail Standards

    American Correctional Associations Standards
    Jail Standards
    Boot Camp Standards
    Prison Standards
    Jails
    Corrections Statutory and Administration Law
    ACA Prison Standards Assignment (Group Exercise)

    Readings: Cripe, Chapter #19 -- Cripe, Chapter 17

    Unit #11 — Correctional Employee Liability and Litigations

    How a Law Suite Works
    Indemnity
    Negligence: Simple versus Gross
    "Color of Law" — "Color of Authority"
    Supervisor Liability
    Failure to Train
    Failure to Supervise
    American Disabilities Act (ADA)

    Readings: Collins, Chapter #12 -- Collins, Chapter #13 -- Collins, Chapter #15 --

    Cripe, Chapter 18

    Unit #12 — Section 1983 Law suites — Guards and Prisoners

    Title 42 U.S. Code, Section 1983
    Sovereign Immunity erodes away
    Official Immunity — Absolute — Qualified
    Bivens Type Actions
    Statue of Limitations

    Readings; Cripe, pages 25-27 -- Lecture

    Unit #13 — Correctional Officer Rights

    Union and Professional Associations
    Contacts
    Civil Service Laws
    Affirmative Action — Discrimination
    Sexual Harassment
    Urine Testing
    Polygraph tests
    Employee Discipline

    Readings: Collins, Chapter #8

    Unit #14 — First Amendment Prisoner Rights: Inmate Mail and Telephone

    Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396 (1974)
    Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974) see also Unit 6
    Turner v. Safley, , 482 U.S. 78 (1987)
    Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S. 401 (1989)
    Procunier v. Navarette, 434 U.S. 555 (1978)
    Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979) see also unit 9

    Readings: Collins, Chapter #6 -- Cripe, Chapter #7

    Unit #15 — First Amendment Prisoner Rights: Association Rights and Visiting

    Restrictions on Who Can Visit Prisoners
    Kentucky Department of Corrections v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454 (1989)
    Freedom of Association — Communication and Union Formation
    Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, 433 U.S. 119 (1977)
    Inmate Visits
    Block v. Rutherford, 468 U.S. 576 (1984)
    News Media Association
    Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817 (1974)
    Saxbe v. Washington Post Company, 417 U.S. 843 (1974)
    Houchins v. KQED, Inc., 438 U.S. 1 (1978)

    Readings: Cripe, Chapter #8 -- Collins, Chapter #6

    Unit #16 — First Amendment Prisoner Rights: Religion

    Establishment of Religion
    Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319 (1972)
    Freedom of Exercise Religion in Prisons
    O'Lone v. Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342 (1987)
    Prisoner Religion Assignment (Group Exercises)

    Readings: Cripe, Chapter #9 -- Collins, Chapter #6

    Unit #17 — Eighth Amendment Prisoner Rights: Conditions of Confinement and Cruel and Usual

    Death Penalty
    Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972)
    Overcrowding in Prisons and Jails
    Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979) see also Unit 14
    Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337 (1981)
    Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312 (1986)
    Wilson v. Seiter, 501 U.S. 294 (1991)
    Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (1992)
    Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994)
    Helling v. McKinney, 509 U.S. 25 (1993)

    Readings: Collins, Chapter #8 -- Cripe, Chapter #14

    Unit #18 — Eighth Amendment Prisoners Rights: Health Care

    Governing Constitutional Case on Providing Health Care
    Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976)
    Deliterate Indifference
    West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)
    Private Community Treatment
    Washington v. Happer, 494 U.S. 210 (1990)
    Inmate Suides
    Logue v. United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973)
    HIV and Aids

    Readings: Collins, Chapter #9 -- Collins, Chapter #14 -- Collins, Chapter 15 --

    Cripe, Chapter #15
     
     

    CJ 4135

    CORRECTIONAL LAW — INDIVIDUAL CASE ASSIGNMENTS

    CASE ASSIGNMENTS: 1 page brief

    CASE DATE NAME

    Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263 (1980) Everyone

    Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483 (1969)

    Lewis v. Casey, 116 S.ct. 2174 (1996) In Class

    Ruffin v. the Commonwealth of Virginia, 62 Va. (21 Grath) 790 (1871) In Class

    Valentin v. Englehardtt, 492 F. Supp. 1039, D.N.J. (1980)

    Miranda v. Arizona (1966) In Class

    Mapp v. Ohio (1961) In Class

    Wolff v. McDonnel, 418 U.S. 539 (1974)

    Exparte Hull, 312 U.S. 546 (1941)

    Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977)

    Lewis v. Cassey, 64 U.S.L.W. 4587 (1996)

    Murry v. Giarratano, 492 U.S. 1 (1989)

    Wolf v. Martinez, 418 U.S. 539 (1974)

    Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971

    Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984)

    Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979)

    Lanza v. New York, 370 U.S. 139 (1962)

    Baxter v. Paligiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976)

    Superintendent v. Helms, 472 U.S. 445 (1985)

    Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396 (1974)

    Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987)

    Thornburgh v. Abbott 490 U.S. 401 (1989)

    Procunier v. Navarette, 434 U.S. 555 (1978)

    Kentucky Dept. of Corrections v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454 (1989)

    Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, 433 U.S. 119 (1977)

    Block v. Rutherford, 468 U.S. 576 (1984)

    Pell v. Procunier, 417 U.S. 817 (1974)

    Saxbe v. Washington Post Company, 417 U.S. 843 (1974)

    Houchins v. KQED, Inc. 438 U.S. 1 (1978)

    Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319 (1972)

    O'Lone v. Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342 (1987)

    Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337 (1981)

    Whittley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312 (1986)

    Wilson v. Selter, 501 U.S. 294 (1991)

    Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (1992)

    Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994)

    Helling v. McKinney, 509 U.S. 25 (1993)

    Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976)

    West v. Atkins, 487 U.s. 42 (1988)

    Washington v. Happer, 494 U.S. 210 (1990)

    Loque v. United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973)

    TENTATIVE CLASS SCHEDULE AND TENTATIVE EXAM DATES





    Friday February 15 Unit #1 Introduction/Course Requirements

    Monday February 18 Unit #2

    Wednesday February 20 Unit #2

    Friday February 22 Unit #3

    Monday February 25 Unit #4 Individual Case Assignment (Everyone)

    Wednesday February 27 Unit #5

    Friday March 1 Unit #5 (continued)

    Monday March 4 Unit #6

    Wednesday March 6 Unit #6 (continued)

    Friday March 8 Unit #6 (continued)

    Monday March 11 Unit #7

    Wednesday March 13 Unit #7 (continued)

    Friday March 15 Unit #8 NCJRS Assignment (group)

    Monday March 18 Unit #8 (continued)

    Wednesday March 20 Unit #9

    Friday March 22 Unit #9 (continued) ACA Prison Standards (group)

    Assignments

    Monday March 25 Unit #10

    Wednesday March 27 Unit #10

    Friday March 29 Exam I (1 hour) tentative

    Monday April 1 Holiday — Cesar Chavez Day — No Class

    Wednesday/Friday April 3 & 5 SPRING BREAK — No Classes

    Monday April 8 Unit #11

    Wednesday April 10 Unit #11

    Friday April 12 Unit #12

    Monday April 15 Unit #12 (continued)

    Wednesday April 17 Unit #13

    Friday April 19 Unit #13 (continued)

    Monday April 22 Exam II (1 hour) tentative

    Wednesday April 24 Unit #14

    Friday April 26 Unit #14 (continued)

    Monday April 29 Unit #14 (continued)

    Wednesday May 1 Unit #15

    Friday May 3 Unit #15 (continued)

    Monday May 6 Unit #16 Prisoner Religion Assignment (group)

    Wednesday May 8 Unit #16 (continued)

    Friday May 10 Unit #16 (continued)

    Monday May 13 Unit #17

    Wednesday May 15 Unit #17 (continued)

    Friday May 17 Unit #18 TERM PAPER DUE

    Monday May 20 Unit #18 (continued)

    Wednesday May 22 REVIEW