Another good place to begin your research is by looking up the cases that the court cited in your case. Obviously, if the court felt that a case was relevant, it probably is. Often, reading these cases will lead you to yet more cases. The library at CSU, Stanislaus has federal court decisions (except very recent ones) and California decisions. U.S. Supreme Court decisions since 1991, recent U.S. Circuit Court decisions, and some state court decisions are available on the World Wide Web . Most other decisions can be found on Lexis-Nexis , or at a law library.
Finally, many students choose to contact the attorneys in the original case. Many attorneys are willing to send a copy of their briefs to students who request them. The names of the attorneys are listed at the beginning of the case, and their contact information is frequently available through West's Legal Directory . If you wish to contact the attorneys, make sure you do so early; it may take some time before they are able to respond to your request.Selected briefs are also available on Lexis-Nexis.
Make sure you check that all your cases are still good law. You can do this by using Shepard's Case Citator (available in law libraries) or by using Lexis-Nexis .
The parts of a brief are as follows (the brief used to illustrate these components was written by Lissa Parker, a student in my Legal Research and Writing class). Note that some of the formatting in the orginal brief, particularly the formatting of citations, has been lost in the conversion to HTML. Your brief should follow the appropriate formatting rules.
The Title Page contains the full names of the litigants, the docket number, an indication of whether it is the appellant's or appellee's brief, the name of the appeals court, the name of the lower court, and the names of the attorney(s) who wrote the brief.
The Table of Contents lists the page numbers of each of the other parts of the brief (except the Title Page and the Table of Contents itself), including the pages on which the main and sub arguments can be found. Obviously, you will probably write this part after the rest of the brief is complete.
The Table of Authorities lists every page number on which each case, statute, constitutional provision, law review article, or other authority is mentioned. Give the full and proper citation for each authority.
The portion should contain a concise (usually one sentence) statement of each of the legal issues that is being appealled. A good attorney should be able to word these issues so as to subtly favor his or her side. The questions usually begin with "Whether," "Is," or "Does".
This section presents a relatively detailed description of the events that led to the case. The detail here is much greater than would be given in the "Facts" section of a student brief. Again, a good attorney should pay attention to structure and word usage so as to subtly favor his or her side.
Your arguments for each issue should be summarized in a paragraph or two. Make sure your summaries are in the same order as the Questions Presented.
This is the main text of your brief. You should present your arguments in order. Each section should be preceded by a brief, one sentence statement of the argument. That statement should be numbered so as to coincide with the Questions Presented, and should be underlined. If your issues are complex, you might want to summarize subarguments as well.
Your arguments should be well-thought-out, well-written, and supported by authorities (usually other cases). Use quotations sparingly. Give proper citations to the sources of all authorities.
This is usually a single sentence, which clearly states what outcome you desire. For example, "For the foregoing reasons, the opinion of the Court of Appeals should be overruled, and a new trial ordered." Below this, write "Repectfully submitted,". Then you and your co-counsel should sign the document.
When you're satisfied with your brief, double-check that all your case citations are current.
Copyright by Phyllis B. Gerstenfeld
phyllisg@toto.csustan.edu Last modified 11 June 2002