STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Carl Convict is seeking to have the sentencing decision of the Superior
Court vacated on the grounds that the special conditions of his probation,
as outlined below, violate his rights to religious freedom as guaranteed
under the first amendment, made applicable to the states under the fourteenth
amendment, and that they bear no relationship to the crime of which he
has been convicted.
Mr. Convict was convicted of attempted unarmed robbery and sentenced to
six months in jail and five years of probation. Special conditions were
placed upon Mr. ConvictÕs probation that require 1) that he abstain from
drinking alcohol in any form, and from using illegal drugs; 2) that he
submit to random urinalysis to check for alcohol and drug use; and 3) that
he regularly attend Alcoholics Anonymous.
Mr. Convict is a member of the Bacchus Church whose tenets require members
to drink one glass of ŌHoly WineĶ (an alcoholic beverage) each day or risk
eternal damnation. The Bacchus Church also requires that its members take
sole responsibility for their fate, and not share that responsibility with
any other being. These beliefs and practices are in direct conflict with
those of Alcoholics Anonymous. The components of each, the Bacchus Church
and Alcoholics Anonymous, are, in fact, mutually exclusive.
It is undisputed that neither alcohol nor drugs in any way contributed
to the offense of which Mr. Convict was convicted. And Mr. Convict does
attest to overcoming a past alcohol issue.
The circumstances surrounding Mr. ConvictÕs offense were simply that after
attempts to obtain money for his wifeÕs cancer treatment by any and all
legal means failed, he attempted robbery, unarmed. This was Mr. ConvictÕs
first conviction for any crime.